This is a legal question that has to be answered in the context of the litigation under trademark law, and it's a social policy question, ... In theory a famous trademark can be enforced against anybody who uses it commercially. Should Madonna not be able to have a song that uses 'Like a Virgin' in the title on the theory that Virgin record company is actually the owner of the song?

In the beginning, the abatement program was 100 percent responsible for getting things going. Now there is a discussion going on about whether or not it's still needed.

In some of the early Internet infringement cases, there was some tendency to 'baby' consumers by assuming that Internet users are stupid and that domain names can easily mislead them away from the Web sites of trademark holders.

She'll breathe a little bit better. She'll be able to exercise a little bit better and do more things and lead a more normal life and hopefully a longer life.

It's potentially the economic situation that determines the people in the middle.

A domain name is not just the source of a Web site, but the substance of a Web site. You can say the name of the person you're criticizing, and you can put their name in the domain name of your Web site.

As the kids get into their teens, they tend to have more trouble with their breathing and recurrent pneumonia's and they often die from that.

Everybody got their say. I don't feel anybody was walking around angry about the process.

What kind of healthcare service union would stand in the way of a cancer center in New England? That strikes me as the kind of union we don't want.

He was in the general vicinity, he was multi-tasking and in fact, was there during parts of the procedure but not there during the entire insertion to removal of the device.